State Policy

State Policy on Child and Youth Homelessness: 2024 Q3 Update

A summary of state policy highlights in the third quarter of 2024.

The third quarter of an election year is usually lighter in state legislatures, given that the legislative sessions wrapped up in the first or second quarter of the year. However, legislators in a few states were able to move bills forward to address youth homelessness,  and bills in at least two states are still under consideration, giving advocates hope heading into the fourth quarter. Some of the highlights are included below. 

As we enter the few remaining months of the year, the SHC state policy team has initiated work for 2025 in several states. We hope to share more on that activity in the next quarterly update. In the meantime, for additional information, including how to get involved in your state, please contact Rodd Monts, Director of State Policy.

Improving Access to Vital Documents: Pennsylvania, Alabama

SHC joined the National Network for Youth, the Homeless Children’s Education Fund, the American Bar Association’s Commission on Homelessness and Poverty, and Western PA Continuum of Care, to help push HB 127 across the finish line before the end of the year. HB 127 would waive driver’s license fees for youth experiencing homelessness. SHC has supported coalition partners with advocacy training and by engaging sponsors and other legislators to gain their support. The bill passed in the House this summer and now awaits a vote in the Senate.

Increasing Access to Shelter and Health Care

The Michigan Network for Youth and Families (MNYF) and Michigan’s Children launched a campaign to advocate for a Senate vote on two bills, already passed by the House, that aim to support youth experiencing homelessness..

HB 4085 would increase the time that shelter providers can serve youth experiencing homelessness with or without parental consent from 24 to 72 hours to give providers the appropriate time to act in the best interest of these young people. HB 4086 will offer additional protection of children through the licensing and regulation of childcare organizations, establish standards of care for child care organizations, and allow certain licensed organizations to serve homeless youth.

Advocates are urging supporters to contact Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (and/or their respective senator) and ask for the bills to move to a vote. The bills have bipartisan support. 

The advocacy this fall to improve access to health care will continue in earnest. SHC is partnering with MNYF, Michigan’s Children and other advocates on HB 4087, which allows youth experiencing homelessness to get the care they need by allowing unaccompanied minors to consent to their own medical care and treatment. The bill remains under review of the House Committee on Families, Children and Seniors.

Connecting More Students to Financial Aid

Lawmakers continue weighing bills that would improve access to financial aid. SHC generally supports Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) completion legislation; however, unaccompanied homeless youth and foster youth can be unintentionally exempted from FAFSA completion requirements, rather than receive the support that they need to complete the FAFSA.

In California, SHC supported an effort led by John Burton Advocates for Youth (JBAY), uAspire and other groups on AB 2165 which passed in September. The bill enshrines FAFSA completion guidelines into state law. It  requires local educational agencies (LEAs) to ensure that a guidance counselor meets with students, and that LEAs post data on the number of student exemptions.

SHC also supported AB 2137, led by JBAY and the National Center for Youth Law. This new act takes effect in January and aims to improve educational outcomes for foster youth by authorizing county offices of education to use their existing state funding to provide direct services to those students through the Foster Youth Services Coordinating Programs (FYSCPs). Current law prohibits that use unless school districts certify in writing that they cannot provide direct services to students in foster care. Allowing FYSCPs this access gives program staff the ability to provide tailored interventions and support to ensure youth are aware of financial aid and postsecondary options. 

While AB 2137 will help many foster youth, we were disappointed that homelessness provisions were stripped from the bill before passage. Those provisions would have required LEAs to consider the needs of students experiencing homelessness by requiring consultation with the homeless student liaison during the development of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP). LEAs that identified less than 10 percent of their low-income students as homeless would have been required to describe the actions they have taken, or will take, to implement California’s required protocol for identifying homeless students. California has the highest number of K12 students experiencing homelessness, yet no dedicated funding to support them. We will support the efforts of our CA advocacy partners to improve resources for students experiencing homelessness in the next session.

Removing Barriers to Transportation

Legislators in New Jersey continue their efforts to adequately fund the transportation of students experiencing homelessness. A 4545 and its companion, S 3537, were introduced this summer. The legislation would require the state to reimburse school districts for expenses that exceed the average in-district per pupil cost for transporting students. These bills represent the second attempt this session by the New Jersey legislature (A 3658, also providing reimbursement to districts, was introduced earlier this year) to address the transportation costs of students experiencing homelessness.

Increasing Access to Child Care

The California legislature moved to expand support and navigation services for families experiencing homelessness participating in state programming. Lawmakers passed AB 2343, which allows certain CalWORKs child care programs to offer services to child care recipients experiencing homelessness, escaping domestic abuse, or both – in partnership with homeless services, domestic violence agencies, or supportive housing initiatives.